Calibration Loop¶
What It Is¶
A calibration loop closes the gap between a tool's predictions and reality by logging both, every cycle, and bounding trust by the observed hit rate. For synthetic-consumer-panels: record which variant the panel picked, then record the real post-publication metric (clicks, replies, captures), and track how often the panel was right.
The Rules¶
- Mandatory, not optional — without it the panel is an unvalidated guess (see domain-transfer-risk).
- Advisory until calibrated — at 2–3 published experiments/week it takes ~6–10 weeks before the synthetic-vs-real hit rate is statistically meaningful. Until then the panel is a tiebreaker, never a veto.
- Real behavior > stated intent — the factory's ground truth (actual engagement) is better than the survey panels SSR was validated against, which only approximate behavior.
- The log is an asset — calibration data is itself publishable original research (the first-party-statistics GEO play) and the AI-vs-manual benchmark the KB's gaps name.
How It Applies to Marketing Factory¶
Every predictive agent gate needs a calibration loop wired into its agent-workflow-pattern Output: the structured experiment row is exactly the data the loop consumes. This generalizes beyond SSR — any time an agent makes a call that reality will later score (subject lines, send times, channel picks), log prediction-vs-outcome and let the measured hit rate set how much autonomy the agent gets.
Related Concepts¶
- synthetic-consumer-panels — the tool this loop calibrates first
- domain-transfer-risk — the risk calibration empirically bounds
- agent-workflow-pattern — the loop consumes the pattern's logged outputs
Referenced from: ssr-synthetic-panels